The National Association for Gun Rights is completely dependent on generous donations from passionate Second Amendment advocates.
Frontline Defenders
Gun rights activists are the first line of defense in the fight for our Second Amendment freedoms. Become a Frontline Defender today.
2A Legacy Society
We all have a duty to pass on the freedoms we’ve enjoyed to future generations. Use our 2A Legacy giving in order to make an impact for our gun rights.
The United States Supreme Court is on the clock to deliver a ruling on Cargill v. Garland by June.
Following the tragedy in Las Vegas in late 2017, the ATF moved to ban bump stocks under discretion from the White House – classifying them as machine guns.
Since then, circuit courts have come to different conclusions as to whether a bump stock is legally a machine gun, however, the ban remains in place pending the Supreme Court ruling.
A bill has already been introduced in Congress to regulate bump stocks, should the Supreme Court strike down the ban.
While the pending case mainly deals with bump stocks, other “rapid-fire” devices, such as the forced-reset trigger are also under legal scrutiny.
By definition, the National Firearms Act of 1934 defines a machine gun as a “gun that firearms more than one round with a single function of the trigger.”
Functionally, forced-reset triggers and bump stocks allow a firearm to fire at a rapid pace, although firing once every time the trigger is pulled.
The National Association for Gun Rights is representing Rare Breed Triggers, who designed the first forced-reset trigger, in a separate lawsuit.
A federal district court in Texas already ruled the ATF’s ban on forced-reset triggers is “likely unlawful,” and the National Association for Gun Rights was granted a preliminary injunction that encompassed all dues paying members.
In that case, Judge Reed O’Connor said:
“The definition of machinegun ‘utilizes a grammatical construction that ties the definition to the movement of the trigger itself, and not the movement of a trigger finger.’ The statute does not say ‘by a single pull of the trigger finger.’ Nor does it say ‘by single function of the trigger finger.’”
A ruling could drop any day now from the United State Supreme Court on “rapid-fire devices.”
Get in the fight for your Second Amendment rights! Subscribe to our newsletter and be the first to know about breaking news, exclusive events, exciting giveaways, and critical updates that keep you informed and empowered. Don’t miss out—join the movement today!
By participating, you agree to the terms & privacy policy for recurring autodialed donation messages from NAGR to the phone number you provide. No consent required to buy. Msg&data rates may apply.
